| From: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Schmidt, Peter" <peter(dot)schmidt(at)prismedia(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance |
| Date: | 2001-02-21 03:35:53 |
| Message-ID: | 3A933799.FA766ACA@tpf.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers |
I Inoue wrote:
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > > platform) i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC egcs-2.91.60(turbolinux 4.2)
> > > min delay) 10msec according to your test program.
> > > -B) 64 (all other settings are default)
> >
> > Thanks. Could I trouble you to run it again with a larger -B, say
> > 1024 or 2048? What I've found is that at -B 64, the benchmark is
> > so constrained by limited buffer space that it doesn't reflect
> > performance at a more realistic production setting.
> >
>
> Hmm the result doesn't seem that obvious.
>
> First I got the following result.
Sorry I forgot to mention the -B setting of my previous
posting. All results are with -B 1024.
Regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2001-02-21 15:21:46 | RE: Re: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance |
| Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2001-02-21 01:53:45 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: v7.1b4 bad performance |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2001-02-21 04:01:22 | RE: Multibyte examples |
| Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2001-02-21 01:53:45 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: v7.1b4 bad performance |