Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Steve Prentice <prentice(at)cisco(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch
Date: 2009-10-08 16:53:24
Message-ID: 3A7B55B9-7B88-408E-99AE-A4AD0E3A8578@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Oct 8, 2009, at 9:47 AM, Jeff Davis wrote:

> It's just the call notation -- the function only needs to know what
> arguments it got for which parameters.

So they're still ordered? I'm thinking of PL/Perl here…

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-10-08 16:57:34 Re: Writeable CTEs and side effects
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-10-08 16:50:41 Re: COPY enhancements