| From: | Daniele Orlandi <daniele(at)orlandi(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Guenter <bruceg(at)em(dot)ca>, "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: AW: beta testing version |
| Date: | 2000-12-06 23:13:33 |
| Message-ID: | 3A2EC81D.A4D12E23@orlandi.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Guenter wrote:
>
> - Assume that a CRC is a guarantee. A CRC would be a good addition to
> help ensure the data wasn't broken by flakey drive firmware, but
> doesn't guarantee consistency.
Even a CRC per transaction (it could be a nice END record) ?
Bye!
--
Daniele
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Daniele Orlandi - Utility Line Italia - http://www.orlandi.com
Via Mezzera 29/A - 20030 - Seveso (MI) - Italy
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John Pilley | 2000-12-06 23:31:28 | Request for INSTALL help |
| Previous Message | Chris Jones | 2000-12-06 22:00:34 | Re: Questions from a Newbie |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Guenter | 2000-12-07 00:53:37 | Re: CRCs (was: beta testing version) |
| Previous Message | Randy Jonasz | 2000-12-06 22:09:31 | RFC C++ Interface |