| From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Horology regress test changed? |
| Date: | 2000-11-08 02:57:48 |
| Message-ID: | 3A08C12C.3C428515@alumni.caltech.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I did, but the log didn't say anything about unfixed regression test
> cases. If you're going to leave some platform-specific comparison
> files un-updated, I think it'd be polite to warn people about that
> explicitly... probably on pghackers, not just committers...
*sigh*
I'll probably always leave some platform-specific comparison files
unupdated, and I would expect others to have to do that also. I
apparently did not meet your expectations on this, but it is quite in
line with our accepted practices.
Sorry for the heart stoppage when you saw your regression tests suddenly
failing...
> I have updated horology-no-DST-before-1970.out, but that still leaves
> us needing updates for horology-1947-PDT.out and
> horology-solaris-1947.out.
I guess that we have already heard from someone on one of those, and the
others will come with time.
Regards.
- Thomas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2000-11-08 06:51:28 | Re: Issue NOTICE for attempt to raise lock level? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-11-08 00:12:41 | Re: Need a debugging tip or two |