Re: AW: AW: Issue NOTICE for attempt to raise lock level?

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: AW: AW: Issue NOTICE for attempt to raise lock level?
Date: 2000-11-07 17:41:02
Message-ID: 3A083EAE.CA49C6B5@tm.ee
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> I am not nearly as worried about long-running transactions that delay
> admin actions as I am about admin actions that crash other transactions.
> I do not believe it is safe to drop read locks intra-transaction, and
> I am unwilling to take a chance on it being safe so close to 7.1 beta.

Will we still have readers-dont-block-writers behaviour?
i.e. will the read lock lock only rows visible to current transaction ?
Or am i talking about something completely different ?

-------------
Hannu

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mikheev, Vadim 2000-11-07 17:54:14 RE: AW: Issue NOTICE for attempt to raise lock level?
Previous Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB 2000-11-07 17:29:05 AW: AW: Issue NOTICE for attempt to raise lock level?