From: | Karl DeBisschop <kdebisschop(at)alert(dot)infoplease(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | |
Cc: | pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) |
Date: | 2000-10-31 16:28:26 |
Message-ID: | 39FEF32A.AD89D766@alert.infoplease.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports |
Lamar Owen wrote:
> As to why the package is split, well, it is highly useful to many people
> to have a PostgreSQL _client_ installation that accesses a central
> database server -- there is no need to have a postmaster and a full
> backend when all you need is psql and the libraries and documentation
> that goes along with psql.
My personal experience is that the way the PostgreSQL RPMs are split is very good. It meshes nicely with other dependencies so that I don't need to install extra RPMs on our servers. I for one would not like to see that change.
--
Karl DeBisschop kdebisschop(at)alert(dot)infoplease(dot)com
Learning Network Reference http://www.infoplease.com
Netsaint Plugin Developer kdebisschop(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lamar Owen | 2000-10-31 16:29:20 | PostgreSQL 7.0.2-21 RPMset available. |
Previous Message | Craig N. Caroon | 2000-10-31 16:07:31 | Converting to PostgresQL and have some questions. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lamar Owen | 2000-10-31 16:29:20 | PostgreSQL 7.0.2-21 RPMset available. |
Previous Message | Luis Magaa | 2000-10-31 16:14:21 | Re: Data definition for aclitem Datatype |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Ribe | 2000-10-31 16:34:41 | pgsql on Mac OS X? |
Previous Message | Lamar Owen | 2000-10-31 15:51:09 | Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) |