Re: new maintainer for the ODBC driver?

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Kovacs Zoltan Sandor <tip(at)pc10(dot)radnoti-szeged(dot)sulinet(dot)hu>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org, dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk
Subject: Re: new maintainer for the ODBC driver?
Date: 2000-10-25 14:43:12
Message-ID: 39F6F180.C187BD39@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

> The ODBC driver still seems to be an important part of PostgreSQL. So I
> really support your idea. Unfortunately I really have no time for this and
> I'm rather new to the driver and Postgres internal communication. AFAIK
> Thomas Lockhart offered his work in May but I don't think he had enough
> time to check what happened on the list since then.

Hi Zoltan. I *finally* committed your patches to the main tree a few
minutes ago. Sorry for the huge delay. afaik you are the defacto
maintainer of ODBC :)

- Thomas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2000-10-25 15:02:17 RE: Re: [INTERFACES] RE: JDBC now needs updates for lar ge objects
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-10-25 14:41:33 Re: signals in ODBC?