Re: Increasing system speed by using -F option

From: Ron Chmara <ron(at)Opus1(dot)COM>
To: Mark Alliban <MarkA(at)idnltd(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Increasing system speed by using -F option
Date: 2000-09-03 05:00:00
Message-ID: 39B1DAC2.60B718CF@opus1.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> Mark Alliban wrote:
> Are there any ways of achieving similar speed increases without using the -F option? I am using RedHat 6.1, 7.0.2, -B 2048 -N 1024 -i.

Many factors affect overall speed. You may have done some of these already, you
may not have considered others.

1. Tune the kernel. RH 6.1 ships with scads of stuff you will never use (such as
making a box into a high-speed-token-ring-router-to-isdn-multiplexor) turned on,
making for a slower machine overall. Rip it all out, and recompile.

2. Turn other processes off. xfs, nfs, kudzu, pcmcia, inetd, httpd... all sorts of
stuff is taking up your cpu cycles, your network bandwidth, your system bus.
Anything you don't use hourly, *remove* from your running table. Anything you only
use a few times an hour, nice[] it down. Anything that can be done on another box,
do it there. For god's sake, don't run X on the same box, play mp3's, whatever.

3. Use a faster disk bus. Many folks start out with a single development machine,
using some slower Ultra ATA/IDE disk, limiting their throughput to 33/66MB
at _maximum_. The latest SCSI busses hit a theoretical 160MB, without tying
up the CPU (as IDE/ATA does). You *can* get that kind of speed boost just by
going from a cheapie IDE disk server to a high performance disk setup.

4. Use RAID. Again, this can be a trade-off of speed/stability, depending on
the flavour of RAID. If you use a RAID card with a built-in battery, and can
keep your drives powered separately from your motherboard, a power event
may be staved off long enough for a write. Hardware RAID is faster than OS
driven RAID.

5. Split your data files out to different busses. On my heaviest RedHat
data box, I have 4 160MB SCSI busses, with a striped RAID on each, 128MB
disk cache per pair of busses... this means that rather than maxing out
at the limit of one disk bus, I can push to the maximum of 4 busses.

6. Fast disks are required for fast busses. 10K RPM at minimum, look for
extremely low latency speeds, as most DB's aren't about high speed overall
thoughput, but many tiny quick transactional hits.

7. Turn off any excessive logging. By default, many redhat boxen log an
insane amount (all email, all logins, etc.), fsyc'ing every time, slowing the
other disk writes (i.e. postgresql) down.

8. Get another CPU and/or more RAM. A second CPU will speed up _any_ multiprocess
machine, more RAM means more of an OS-based disk cache for reads.

You may or may not increase speed by 3x, (especially if you've already done
all this), but it can get you closer (or even exceed it, you didn't say much
about your hardware)... you might also want to focus on asking the question of
*how* you could use -F "safely", by:
1. Using a reliable set of OS software,
2. battery backups (UPS'S),
3. redundant power supplies for both your CPU boxes and your disk boxes,
4. keep the box under lock and key (to avoid the "plug kickout" factor),
5. backup hourly,
6. Deny any non-postgresql uses of the box (prevent crashes/stalls/load
from other user processes)

HTH,
-Bop
--
Brought to you from iBop the iMac, a MacOS, Win95, Win98, LinuxPPC machine,
which is currently in MacOS land. Your bopping may vary.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-09-03 05:07:28 Re: [Solved] SQL Server to PostgreSQL
Previous Message Mark Kirkwood 2000-09-03 04:15:48 WAL in 7.x ?