Re: pg_autovacuum (pg_avd version 2)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_autovacuum (pg_avd version 2)
Date: 2003-03-19 04:53:34
Message-ID: 3993.1048049614@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Did we not tend in the direction of a server-side solution?

> We did, but he contacted me directly asking if it could be put in
> /contrib for 7.4 so it would get some testing and usage. Is that valid?

I think a server-side solution is the way to go in the long run, but
since one probably won't be available for 7.4, a contrib module seems
like a reasonable stopgap offering. Contrib is our traditional refuge
for "not ready for prime time" code, no? The fact that it's a client
and doesn't touch server-side code actually works in its favor here
--- there's nothing to rip out after we have a better answer.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-03-19 21:06:59 Re: [HACKERS] Simplifying timezone support
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-03-19 03:31:30 Re: pg_autovacuum (pg_avd version 2)