Re: location of change list?

From: Ed Loehr <eloehr(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pggeneral <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: location of change list?
Date: 2000-07-13 22:50:24
Message-ID: 396E47B0.7636162D@austin.rr.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Ed Loehr <eloehr(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com> writes:
> > Can anyone point me to a list of changes and bug-fixes *by release* for
> > 7.0.1 and 7.0.2 over 7.0?
>
> The only really accurate info is in the CVS logs. Bruce usually
> prepares a summary for the release history, but if that's not good
> enough for you, get out your cvs client and look for yourself.
>
> The best way I've found so far is to cd to the top level of the
> area you are interested in (probably the top of your copy of the
> source tree) and do
>
> cvs log -rREL7_0_PATCHES -d '>2000-05-10' -N | more
>
> This is still pretty noisy --- it prints header info for all files
> including ones that haven't been modified in that branch, which tends to
> swamp out the stuff you're looking for :-(. Does anyone have a better
> recipe?

This is almost too ugly to mention, but you could adopt a convention in
which "official" changelog entries (i.e., those to be auto-pumped into a
web page) are prefaced by some sort of tag to be filtered by grep, e.g.,

cvs log -rREL7_0_PATCHES -d '>2000-05-10' -N |
grep OFFICIAL_CHANGE_LOG_ENTRY_TAG | more

Not suggesting that verbosity, but you get the idea...

A concise, web-obvious change-list would be valuable for people asking
the question, "What would I get if I upgraded to the latest version?"
Nice not to have to download the software or access CVS from that
perspective. May I suggest OpenSSL's changelog as a good model for
that? Maybe they might lend some insight as to how to make it
manageable...

http://www.openssl.org/news/changelog.html

Regards,
Ed Loehr

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Bitmead 2000-07-14 01:09:41 Re: Object oriented features - MISSING
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-07-13 22:33:26 Re: Figured it out (psql and Gnu readline)