Re: Some Improvement

From: Tim Perdue <tperdue(at)valinux(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Some Improvement
Date: 2000-07-13 14:10:35
Message-ID: 396DCDDB.4A259C4C@valinux.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> I have corrected this silly oversight. Attached is the patch needed to
> make backwards index scans work properly in 7.0.*.

God - don't you love Open Source Software? You probably don't remember,
but 1 1/2 years ago, I ran into this "2GB Disaster limit" and I think
you were the one that came up with a patch to bring the segment size
down to 1GB within like 24hrs.

I'll apply the patch and rebuild - thanks.

Tim

--
Founder - PHPBuilder.com / Geocrawler.com
Lead Developer - SourceForge
VA Linux Systems
408-542-5723

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2000-07-13 16:01:18 Re: Questions relating to "modified while in use" messages
Previous Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB 2000-07-13 13:57:49 AW: Temp tables performance question