From: | Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: postgres 7.2 features. |
Date: | 2000-07-11 05:38:50 |
Message-ID: | 396AB2EA.74528A33@nimrod.itg.telecom.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> >
> > The bottom line is that the original postgres time-travel implementation
> > was totally cost-free. Actually it may have even speeded things
> > up since vacuum would have less work to do. Can you convince me that
> > triggers can compare anywhere near for performance? I can't see how.
> > All I'm asking is don't damage anything that is in postgres now that
> > is relevant to time-travel in your quest for WAL....
>
> Basically, time travel was getting in the way of more requested features
Do you mean way back when it was removed? How was it getting in the way?
> that had to be added. Keeping it around has a cost, and no one felt the
> cost was worth the benefit. You may disagree, but at the time, that was
> the consensus, and I assume it still is.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris Bitmead | 2000-07-11 05:50:10 | Re: Alternative new libpq interface. |
Previous Message | Thomas | 2000-07-11 05:09:05 | Re: Slashdot discussion |