| From: | "Robert D(dot) Nelson" <RDNELSON(at)co(dot)centre(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | John Daniels <jmd526(at)hotmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, tgl <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | RE: PostgreSQL & the BSD License |
| Date: | 2000-07-10 12:24:00 |
| Message-ID: | 396995D4@rba6.rbapro.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
>FWIW, this is the information I got in answer to the question "given that
>the source is
>already under the BSD, is it even possible to change it, however slight
>those changes might be?"
>
>Answer: "Only in respect of those who agree to the change - that is why
Stupid question time: BSD allows forking of the code base, perhaps to
proprietary. If going proprietary, I would imagine you could change the
license. So why can't we have a "license fork"?
Rob Nelson
rdnelson(at)co(dot)centre(dot)pa(dot)us
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | NRonayette | 2000-07-10 12:27:43 | Re: SQL question |
| Previous Message | Travis Bauer | 2000-07-10 10:37:09 | SQL question |