| From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Richard Poole <richard(dot)poole(at)vi(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Revised Copyright: is this more palatable? |
| Date: | 2000-07-07 05:28:37 |
| Message-ID: | 39656A85.4C86AA56@alumni.caltech.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
> My personal opinion is to replace the BSD License of 1996 with the BSD
> License of today (and keep up with changes to it), as it has been adopt'd
> by other Open Source Projects ... as is provided on
We can't do this *exactly*: afaict we will need to ship the original UCB
license along with the new license, since that original license required
that it continue to travel with the code. We can't unilaterally
substitute another, similar, license.
- Thomas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-07-07 05:30:40 | Re: lztext and compression ratios... |
| Previous Message | anuj | 2000-07-07 04:53:34 | libpq connectivity |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-07-07 05:30:40 | Re: lztext and compression ratios... |
| Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2000-07-07 05:23:21 | Re: fcntl(F_SETLK) |