Re: ODBC

From: Richard Broersma <richard(dot)broersma(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Marc Fromm <Marc(dot)Fromm(at)wwu(dot)edu>
Cc: "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ODBC
Date: 2009-01-22 00:26:31
Message-ID: 396486430901211626x368b1852hc4dec2492cd42a8e@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Marc Fromm <Marc(dot)Fromm(at)wwu(dot)edu> wrote:
> Some of our users use an ODBC connection between MS Access and an Oracle
> database to work with the data.
> Access however has a 255 field/column limit, which the Oracle Db has now
> execeded.

I am not sure what kind of data model would require 255 columns, but
if there is not in fact de-normalization occurring here and you really
do need > 255 columns in your tables there is a way to make this work
in access.

You can create multiple bound table(sort of like a vertically
partitioned view). In each bound table in access only include the
primary key and a subset of the columns. Of Course this will probably
complicate your application design.

I don't believe that you can bind oracle table to postgresql. There
is a module dbi-link that is similar to what you want to do. This
page might give you some ideas about what is available:

http://pgfoundry.org/search/?type_of_search=soft&words=dbi+link

--
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.

Visit the Los Angeles PostgreSQL Users Group (LAPUG)
http://pugs.postgresql.org/lapug

In response to

  • ODBC at 2009-01-21 23:31:03 from Marc Fromm

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Monnerie 2009-01-22 01:05:42 Re: Why is that index not used?
Previous Message Marc Fromm 2009-01-21 23:31:03 ODBC