| From: | "Richard Broersma" <richard(dot)broersma(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "m(dot)wetmore(at)secomintl(dot)com" <m(dot)wetmore(at)secomintl(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Los Angles PostgreSQL Users Group" <lapug(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Pamona follow up on functions / triggers / views |
| Date: | 2008-05-31 14:02:58 |
| Message-ID: | 396486430805310702s4d323038x7967e34e1b8c5e17@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | lapug |
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 12:27 AM, m(dot)wetmore(at)secomintl(dot)com
<m(dot)wetmore(at)secomintl(dot)com> wrote:
> I was asked about C server side functions as opposed to straight PL/pgsql.
There was also discussion about keeping views update-able after a view
definition changes:
In my case, I have access automatically rebuild the table links to
update-able views at startup. Here is a link that gives a little
background.
--
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.
Visit the Los Angles PostgreSQL Users Group (LAPUG)
http://pugs.postgresql.org/lapug
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Richard Broersma | 2008-06-02 16:54:09 | PL-Perl presentation for June 27 |
| Previous Message | m.wetmore@secomintl.com | 2008-05-31 07:27:34 | Re: Pamona follow up on functions / triggers / views |