Re: update on TOAST status

From: Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com>
To: Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL HACKERS <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: update on TOAST status
Date: 2000-07-06 00:44:02
Message-ID: 3963D652.60840E73@mascari.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Chris Bitmead wrote:
>
> Jan Wieck wrote:
>
> > Toast tables aren't automatically created for system
> > catalogs. Thus I'll add
> >
> > ALTER TABLE pg_rewrite CREATE TOAST TABLE
> >
> > to initdb. So we'll get unlimited view complexity for free.
> > As soon as arrays are toastable, we might want to add
> > pg_class because of relacl too.
>
> Why would we want system catalogs toastable?

I assume this will allow for Views with large rewrite rules which
currently are limited in size.

Mike Mascari

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Bitmead 2000-07-06 00:52:11 Re: Proposed new libpq API
Previous Message Chris Bitmead 2000-07-06 00:30:40 Re: proposed improvements to PostgreSQL license