Re: Big 7.1 open items

From: Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Big 7.1 open items
Date: 2000-06-22 23:55:15
Message-ID: 3952A763.FDCE1489@nimrod.itg.telecom.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

The Hermit Hacker wrote:

> Or, modify pg_dump so that it auto-dumps to two files, one for schema, one
> for data. then its easier to modify the schema on a large database if
> tablespaces change ...

That's a pretty good idea as an option. But I'd say keep the schema
separate from the tablespace locations. And if you're going down that
path why not create a directory automatically and dump each table into a
separate file. On occasion I've had to restore one table by hand-editing
the pg_dump, and that's a real pain.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Bitmead 2000-06-23 00:35:50 PGSQL internals question...
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2000-06-22 23:35:12 RE: Big 7.1 open items

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Philip Warner 2000-06-23 01:52:49 Re: Big 7.1 open items
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-06-22 22:34:27 Re: Re: [GENERAL] libpq error codes