Re: Big 7.1 open items

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Big 7.1 open items
Date: 2000-06-15 06:29:29
Message-ID: 394877C9.B1CC8114@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

> But seriously, let me give some background. I used Ingres, that used
> the VMS file system, but used strange sequential AAAF324 numbers for
> tables. When someone deleted a table, or we were looking at what
> tables were using disk space, it was impossible to find the Ingres
> table names that went with the file. There was a system table that
> showed it, but it was poorly documented, and if you deleted the table,
> there was no way to look on the tape to find out which file to
> restore.

I had the same experience, but let's put the blame where it belongs: it
wasn't the filename's fault, it was poor design and support from the
Ingres company.

- Thomas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-06-15 06:43:23 Re: input/output functions have been changed ?
Previous Message Ross J. Reedstrom 2000-06-15 06:03:12 Re: Big 7.1 open items

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Bitmead 2000-06-15 06:56:12 Re: Big 7.1 open items
Previous Message Ross J. Reedstrom 2000-06-15 06:03:12 Re: Big 7.1 open items