Re: 7.0.2 cuts off attribute name

From: "Mark Hollomon" <mhh(at)nortelnetworks(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "G(dot) Anthony Reina" <reina(at)nsi(dot)edu>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.0.2 cuts off attribute name
Date: 2000-06-14 12:12:00
Message-ID: 39477690.7EEDD568@americasm01.nt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
>
> 7.0 has a new behavior of *telling* you that it's truncating overlength
> identifiers, but the system has always truncated 'em.
>
> If you're simply complaining about the fact that it emits a notice,
> I agree with you 100%: that notice is one of the most nonstandard,
> useless, annoying bits of pointless pedantry I've seen in many years.
> I argued against it to start with but was outvoted. Maybe we can have
> a revote now that people have had some practical experience with it:
> who still thinks it's a good idea?

And while we're at it, let's get rid of the 'implementation' NOTICEs
about foreign keys and UNIQUE.

I don't mind the NOTICE about SERIAL since we don't clean up the
sequence on DROP TABLE.
--

Mark Hollomon
mhh(at)nortelnetworks(dot)com
ESN 451-9008 (302)454-9008

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-06-14 12:35:24 Re: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.1 documentation
Previous Message Vince Vielhaber 2000-06-14 10:34:46 Re: linking error