Re: query optimiser changes 6.5->7.0

Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Joseph Shraibman <jks(at)selectacast(dot)net> writes:
> > OK this may seem like a stupid question, but isn't index scan always
> > better except for the pathalogical simple case where the work to be done
> > is trivial anyway?
>
> No. If it were, the optimizer would be a whole lot simpler ;-)
>
> In practice an indexscan only wins if it will visit a relatively
> small percentage of the tuples in the table. The $64 questions
> are how small is small enough, and how can the optimizer guess
> how many tuples will be hit in advance of doing the query...
>

Isn't there a way to tell the optimizer to use an index scan if one
knows this is going to be the best.

I have seen lots of posts concerning people who are trying to force the
optimizer to use an index scan by rephrasing their SQL statements. Isn't
there a possibility to provide some syntax (non SQL compliant I know) to
force the optimizer to do an index scan?

Regards
Wim