Re: jdbc driver: Why it isn't jdbcCompliant?

I wasn't making a point. I was just including the comment from the
source code to tell why jdbcCompliant() returns false, namely that
postgresql isn't sql 92 compliant.

Gunnar R|nning wrote:
>
> Joseph Shraibman <jks(at)selectacast(dot)net> writes:
>
> Yes - your point being ? I think that you will find that most JDBC drivers
> out there do not implement the spec. to the letter. But using good OO
> design principles and adapters you can easily use a subset of the spec(plus
> your favorite non SQL 92 database extensions) together with appropriate
> adaptors to keep things fairly easy to port between databases. The four
> databases that I know best Sybase ASE, PosgreSQL, Progress V9.1 and MySQL
> do not fully implement the JDBC spec. But then again I think SQL 92 is the
> same story...
>
> Regards,
>
> Gunnar
>
> > >From the Driver source code:
>
> > public boolean jdbcCompliant()
> > {
> > return false;
> > }