| From: | Chris <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: OO Patch |
| Date: | 2000-05-20 00:26:35 |
| Message-ID: | 3925DBBB.BFB00BEB@bitmead.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> Chris, one quick question ... the last email I read from you stated a
> bunch of things that you wanted to accomplish, but your patch only
> addressed the first one. Can we focus on that and ignore the others?
> Do it through step'ng stones? Or does each step only make sense in
> view of the whole picture?
Each of the 3 is independant and useful in and of itself, although all 3
are needed to achieve the goal - an ODMG interface.
We can discuss one by one. It might be useful to start off with a
meta-discussion. Does everyone understand the significance of ODMG, the
the benefits of supporting it?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-05-20 00:32:18 | Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) |
| Previous Message | Chris | 2000-05-20 00:19:00 | Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-05-20 00:32:18 | Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) |
| Previous Message | Chris | 2000-05-20 00:19:00 | Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) |