| From: | Chris <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> |
| Cc: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: OO Patch |
| Date: | 2000-05-20 00:15:58 |
| Message-ID: | 3925D93E.EFEE429@bitmead.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Hannu Krosing wrote:
> It may be time to fork the tree into OO and beancounting editions ?
> Especially so if the main tree will migrate to BDB ;-p
>
> OOPostgreSQL sounds quite nice ;)
I hope we don't have to go there. A better relational engine and a
proper OO engine are completely complementry. That was the whole premise
of the Stonebraker research.
I should also remind people again I guess of my original design proposal
I wrote a few years ago. You can find it here
http://www.tech.com.au/postgres/
These issues have been on my mind ever since Berkeley released R4.2.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris | 2000-05-20 00:19:00 | Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) |
| Previous Message | Chris | 2000-05-19 23:42:45 | Re: OO Patch |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris | 2000-05-20 00:19:00 | Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) |
| Previous Message | Chris | 2000-05-19 23:42:45 | Re: OO Patch |