Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server))

From: Chris <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>
To: Matthias Urlichs <smurf(at)noris(dot)net>
Cc: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Alessio Bragadini <alessio(at)albourne(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server))
Date: 2000-05-19 20:34:06
Message-ID: 3925A53E.8E8E6592@bitmead.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Matthias Urlichs wrote:

> Nonono, the 1000 read() calls are triggered by a simple INSERT or UPDATE
> call. They actually scan the pg_index table of the benchmark database.

Does this only happen on the first call to INSERT/UPDATE after
connecting to the database, or does it happen with all subsequent calls
too?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-05-19 21:03:48 Re: Question about databases in alternate locations...
Previous Message Chris 2000-05-19 19:54:20 Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server))

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-05-19 20:50:31 Re: OO / fe-be protocol
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-05-19 20:08:15 Re: Re: Heaps of read() syscalls by the postmaster