Re: What bison versions are installed on buildfarm machines?

From: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: What bison versions are installed on buildfarm machines?
Date: 2006-01-02 18:30:12
Message-ID: 3910.24.211.165.134.1136226612.squirrel@www.dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane said:
> Is there any way to find out $subject? I see that several of the
> buildfarm machines are choking on a patch I committed yesterday:
>
> guc-file.l: In function `ProcessConfigFile':
> guc-file.l:162: error: `YY_FLUSH_BUFFER' undeclared (first use in this
> function) guc-file.l:162: error: (Each undeclared identifier is
> reported only once guc-file.l:162: error: for each function it appears
> in.)
> make[4]: *** [guc.o] Error 1
>
> YY_FLUSH_BUFFER is documented as a standard macro in bison 1.875, which
> is the oldest version we officially support. But I'm prepared to
> change it if there is another way that would work with a wider range of
> bison versions.
>

Some months ago we put in a feature that allows you to see the log of all
stages, not just the stage that failed. Not all buildfarm members have yet
been updated to that release, unfortunately, so you won't see it on every
details page.

Among those with this failure that have updated is rook. See the stage logs
here:
http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=rook&dt=2006-01-02%2011:39:01
the "config" link is the config.log file configure produces, and the
"configure" link is its stdout.

configure doesn't actually report the bison version, but it does complain if
the version is less than 1.875, and I don't see that on rook.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2006-01-02 18:33:39 Re: What bison versions are installed on buildfarm machines?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-01-02 18:26:20 Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf?