Re: [HACKERS] Patch attached...

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
To: Chris <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>
Cc: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>, Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Patch attached...
Date: 2000-02-05 11:47:50
Message-ID: 389C0DE6.666E1CF4@tm.ee
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Chris wrote:
>
> Don Baccus wrote:
> >
> > At 02:36 PM 2/5/00 +1100, Chris wrote:
> >
> > >*) The overhead for non-inheritance has
> > >been cut down to 30 microseconds (on a pc).
> >
> > What kind of PC?
>
> Cerelon 400, 64MB, IDE disk.

Btw, how did you measure that 30us overhead ?

Does it involve disk accesses or is it just in-memory code that
speed-concious folks could move to assembly like current
spinlocking code for some architectures?

-------------
Hannu

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris 2000-02-05 11:55:12 Re: [HACKERS] Patch attached...
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2000-02-05 10:37:19 TODO item