Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL

From: Chris <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-sql(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL
Date: 2000-02-03 13:05:32
Message-ID: 38997D1C.9F353FED@bitmead.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql

Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Oops:

> test=> drop index i_test;
> DROP
> test=> select relhasindex from pg_class where relname = 'test';
> relhasindex
> -------------
> t
> (1 row)
>
> Let me add that to the TODO list.

Why not change that to a relnumindexes as well? Easier to maintain and
more useful information.

> > >Could you do that for relhassubclass?
> >
> > If we made it relnumsubclasses and incremented/decremented on
> > CREATE/DROP, it seems easy in theory.
>
> Yes, that would work. Seems hasindex has problems.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-02-03 13:26:05 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-02-03 12:37:42 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-02-03 13:26:05 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-02-03 12:37:42 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-02-03 13:26:05 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-02-03 12:37:42 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL