Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace

From: Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace
Date: 2000-01-25 06:07:03
Message-ID: 388D3D87.C1BCE49B@bitmead.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql

Philip Warner wrote:

> >In fact, this is a KEY notion behind RDBMS systems...queries return an
> >unordered set, pure and simple, unless you supply an "order" clause
> >(though "group by" appears to be implemented by ordering in various
> >RDBMS systems, that's an efficiency hack not a given AFAIK).

On second thoughts, maybe I agree DISTINCT ON should be dumped. In my
example, if I wanted the youngest people with a given name sorted oldest
first things would be confusing. It's an inconsistant command, I can see
that now.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-01-25 06:12:46 Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace
Previous Message Michael Robinson 2000-01-25 06:05:36 Re: [HACKERS] fatal copy in/out error (6.5.3)

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-01-25 06:12:46 Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace
Previous Message Philip Warner 2000-01-25 06:00:26 Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace