Re: [HACKERS] Docs

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Ed Loehr <eloehr(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com>
Cc: "Ansley, Michael" <Michael(dot)Ansley(at)intec(dot)co(dot)za>, "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Docs
Date: 2000-01-03 08:20:27
Message-ID: 38705BCB.7B0B9BDD@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > > Another question... how do people normally edit the docs? Is there an sgml
> > > editor that I can use, or should I do it in some other format, and have it
> > > converted, or what?
> > As Vince mentioned, xemacs is the first choice.
> Now, don't go startin' no feud here... if you need a space shuttle, xemacs is
> it. But if you need the One True Editor, well, of course...it's vi/vim. :)

Michael wasn't asking for a space shuttle, but he *was* asking for "an
sgml editor", which implied to me an editor with some knowledge of
sgml notation. afaik The AntiEditor is the only freeware tool to do
this...

btw, xemacs is preferred over emacs since the xemacs "version 6"
implementation of DTD parsing can handle the DocBook DTD, whereas the
newer emacs "version 7" implementation barfs with some internal array
error when reading our docs after parsing the DTD. These are recent
results from my Mandrake/RedHat-6.1 Linux distro.

- Thomas

--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-01-03 08:38:17 Re: [HACKERS] Hmm, almost-a-Y2K-bug in abstime regression test
Previous Message Ed Loehr 2000-01-03 07:57:45 Re: [HACKERS] Docs