| From: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | <thomas(at)tada(dot)se> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <jgardner(at)jonathangardner(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: source documentation tool doxygen |
| Date: | 2006-01-16 13:57:53 |
| Message-ID: | 38611.68.143.134.146.1137419873.squirrel@www.dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Thomas Hallgren said:
> I wish I've had this when I started working with PostgreSQL. This looks
> really good. Very useful indeed, even without the comments. What kind
> of changes are needed in order to get the comments in?
>
I too have done this. But retrofitting Doxygen style comments to the
PostgreSQL source code would be a big undertaking. Maintaining it, which
would be another task for reviewers/committers, would also be a pain unless
there were some automated checking tool.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2006-01-16 14:42:06 | Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) |
| Previous Message | R, Rajesh (STSD) | 2006-01-16 13:57:26 | [PATCH] Better way to check for getaddrinfo function. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-16 17:53:19 | Re: pgsql-committers shouldn't be the default "developers" list |
| Previous Message | Kim Bisgaard | 2006-01-16 12:44:50 | Re: source documentation tool doxygen |