| From: | Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release |
| Date: | 1999-12-10 08:04:46 |
| Message-ID: | 3850B41E.B333CA62@krs.ru |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> Wait, now I'm confused...so between 6.6 and 7, we're talking another year
> anyway? *raised eyebrow* Just curious about your 'long slog' above :)
>
> Here's a question...should we beta on Feb 1st but make it 7.0? If we are
> going to be looking for a "long slog" for 7, why not "freeze" things on
> Feb 1st as v7, and start working on v8 with WAL, long tuples, etc, etc...
>
> Like, what point do we call things a major release? In a sense, MVCC
> probably should have been considered a large enough overhaul to warrant
> 7.0, no?
So, may be call next after 6.6 release just 6.7 ? -:)
Does it so matter - v7, v8? I would be happy with 6.7 -:)
Vadim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 1999-12-10 08:06:16 | Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release |
| Previous Message | Peter Mount | 1999-12-10 07:53:05 | RE: [HACKERS] 6.6 release |