Re: [HACKERS] Re: BOUNCE pgsql-ports@postgreSQL.org: Non-member submission from[Joe Brenner <doom@kzsu.stanford.edu>] (fwd)

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
Cc: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: BOUNCE pgsql-ports@postgreSQL.org: Non-member submission from[Joe Brenner <doom@kzsu.stanford.edu>] (fwd)
Date: 1999-11-29 16:21:52
Message-ID: 3842A820.9E26EA2B@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On a RedHat 6.1 box, I've been having trouble getting the
> perl DBD-Pg package working, wo I decided to try installing
> all of the latest 6.5.3 RPMs you have up on your ftp site.
> Afterwards, I still get the same problem though:
> rpm -Uhv perl-DBD-Pg-0.91-1.i386.rpm
> error: failed dependencies:
> libpq.so.1 is needed by perl-DBD-Pg-0.91-1
> I gather that libpq.so.1 was once supplied with the
> "postgresql-lib" RPM, which has now been split up.
> Did someone forget a piece, or is it just that the DBD-Pg
> rpm now badly in need of an update?

Apparently, perl-DBD-Pg is in need of an update. Didn't the HR6.1 box
come with v6.5.x of Postgres and with DBD-Pg? (I've forgotten...) If
so, DBD-Pg should have been built by RH to be consistant with the
distro so I'm not sure why you are seeing a problem. If it shipped
with some earlier release, then they might be in conflict and we/Lamar
might consider releasing a new version of the perl-DBD-Pg package.

Lamar?

- Thomas

--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 1999-11-29 16:59:59 Re: [HACKERS] perl-DBD-Pg (was Re: BOUNCE pgsql-ports@postgreSQL.org: Non-member submission from[Joe Brenner <doom@kzsu.stanford.edu>] (fwd))
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-11-29 15:44:58 Re: [HACKERS] Development installation fails