Re: [HACKERS] read-only database

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Satoshi Nagayasu <nagayasus(at)nttdata(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] read-only database
Date: 2005-05-10 02:45:45
Message-ID: 3842.1115693145@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> writes:
> The ability to have PGDATA in read-only media (like CDs) has been
> requested a lot of times, hasn't it?

It's come up a few times ... more than an un-overridable read-only mode
anyway. Also, I should think that those who want a secure read-only
mode want it enforced selectively --- for instance, assuredly read-only
for some users but not others. I can hardly see any use case for the
patch as proposed; it seems to have all the disadvantages of a low-level
read-only mode (eg, not selective) without any of the advantages.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-05-10 02:50:34 Re: [HACKERS] read-only database
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-05-10 02:43:13 Re: [HACKERS] read-only database

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-05-10 02:50:34 Re: [HACKERS] read-only database
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-05-10 02:43:13 Re: [HACKERS] read-only database