| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] setseed() doc |
| Date: | 2006-09-20 15:47:39 |
| Message-ID: | 3830.1158767259@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 15:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> AFAICT it's just junk. It happens to be the input times
>> MAX_RANDOM_VALUE, but what use is that? I wonder if we shouldn't
>> change the function to return VOID
> I agree. Given how soon we want to get an 8.2 beta out the door, perhaps
> this change would be best postponed to 8.3 (unless there's another
> outstanding 8.2 patch that requires initdb?).
Nothing outstanding at the moment.
Although this is surely a small change, it's also pretty low-priority,
so I'd counsel leaving it for 8.3 rather than trying to cram it in now.
We have more important things to be worrying about ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jie Zhang | 2006-09-20 16:03:20 | Re: Bitmap index status |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-09-20 15:46:24 | Release Notes: Major Changes in 8.2 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Cave-Ayland | 2006-09-20 19:43:38 | WIP: Hierarchical Queries - stage 1 |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2006-09-20 15:10:15 | Re: setseed() doc |