Re: 8.2 feature set

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: 8.2 feature set
Date: 2006-08-03 13:10:42
Message-ID: 3815.1154610642@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Well if an initdb was not required, I think that would be a huge feature
> ;) (I know it may not work release over release)

If someone had started working on pg_upgrade six months ago, we might
have that for 8.2 ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-08-03 14:17:14 Re: Second annual Harambee!!!! - PostgreSQL @ Linux World - call
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2006-08-03 10:53:04 Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 feature set

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Meskes 2006-08-03 13:12:25 Re: ecpg test suite
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-08-03 13:08:44 Re: Rebuilding DB from broken hardrive.