When will it be implemented

From: Johann Höchtl <big(dot)john(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: When will it be implemented
Date: 1999-10-21 01:33:26
Message-ID: 380E6D66.20DF983B@bigfoot.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi!

I noticed that following the manual,

'In the SQL92 standard, the new column name specified in an "AS" clause
may be referenced in GROUP BY and HAVING clauses. This is not currently
allowed in Postgres. '

To have this featur would ease work, especially when using nested
aggregates (which are currently broken for my 6.5.1: max(count(x)) is
broken ;=)

Maybe in one of the next releases ?

lG
John

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ting Zhou 1999-10-21 05:29:12 How to unlock a table after client dies during a transaction?
Previous Message Lincoln Yeoh 1999-10-21 01:08:15 Re: [GENERAL] Postgres INSERTs much slower than MySQL?