Re: [GENERAL] stored procedure revisited

From: Yin-So Chen <ychen1(at)uswest(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] stored procedure revisited
Date: 1999-10-13 21:01:32
Message-ID: 3804F32C.DD0989ED@uswest.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Peter Mount wrote:
>
> Well, for me it would allow the current kludge that the JDBC driver uses
> for PreparedStatement. Having SP would allow that class to temporarily
> store the procedure, then only the data would need to be transfered to the
> backend. This would improve the majority of JDBC useage enormously.
>

Definitely. For JDBC/ODBC camp, SP is a strong feature to have.
Although for the PrepareStatement it would mean the system needs to
allow "temporary" stored procedure in the database, and is PG's security
mechanism set up for that?

Regards,

yin-so chen

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-10-13 21:15:13 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] How do I activate and change the postgres user's password?
Previous Message Jim Cromie 1999-10-13 20:56:44 mail-list administration