From: | "Steven M(dot) Wheeler" <swheeler(at)sabre(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)hub(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [SQL] Questions about vacuum analyze |
Date: | 1999-10-01 22:24:38 |
Message-ID: | 37F534A6.520A8A37@sabre.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Boy this is fun! ;-}
I have upgraded to 6.5.2 as you suggest. Binaries are built and I am now
re-running my vacuum just to give my self a benchmark starting point.
Just wanted to let you know that, for perl5, when I tried to run "make
test" after having built the perl kit, I get the following:
cobra:/opt/pgsql/postgresql-6.5.2/src/interfaces/perl5 $make test
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl -Iblib/arch -Iblib/lib
-I/usr/lib/perl5/i386-linux -I/usr/lib/perl5 test.pl
Pg::conndefaults ........ ok
Pg::connectdb ........... ok
$conn->exec ............. ok
$conn->errorMessage ..... ok
pqReadData() -- backend closed the channel unexpectedly.
This probably means the backend terminated abnormally
before or while processing the request.
make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
Am I better off re-writing my perl scripts in 'C'? I've been thinking
about it in hopes of boosting the performance.
--
Steven Wheeler
UNIX Engineering
(918) 292-4119
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Steven M. Wheeler" <swheeler(at)sabre(dot)com> writes:
> > DB: version 6.5
> > 33 hours [to vacuum] - WOW!
>
> Yipes. We did find and fix a glitch in memory allocation in vacuum
> (causing both slowness and excessive memory usage) between 6.5 and
> 6.5.2. You might try updating to see if it's gotten any better...
>
> regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jackson, DeJuan | 1999-10-01 22:27:41 | testing unsubscribe |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-10-01 21:42:28 | Re: [SQL] Questions about vacuum analyze |