| From: | Leon <leon(at)udmnet(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Profiling? |
| Date: | 1999-09-27 07:54:02 |
| Message-ID: | 37EF229A.8D81E3D9@udmnet.ru |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Yes, I have done it many times. I profile that postgres process, not
> the backend.
Hmm, isn't Postgres process called backend process? AFAIK postmaster
(it's simply a nickname to Postgres) forks itself on receiveing new
connection request. Isn't it true? I mean that Postmaster is the same
binary as Postgres itself.
> Look for this in Makefile.global:
>
> # Comment out PROFILE to generate a profile version of the binaries
> #PROFILE= -p -non_shared
>
Of course I used -p option. The problem is, when I start Postmaster,
it complains about 'profile timer expired'. What do I do wrong?
--
Leon.
-------
He knows he'll never have to answer for any of his theories actually
being put to test. If they were, they would be contaminated by reality.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Mount | 1999-09-27 08:07:18 | RE: [HACKERS] psql code to be obducted by alien (me) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-09-27 05:31:13 | TODO items (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/include/nodes (execnodes.h)) |