| From: | Theo Kramer <theo(at)flame(dot)co(dot)za> |
|---|---|
| To: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2 |
| Date: | 1999-09-20 07:28:40 |
| Message-ID: | 37E5E228.F3E1321D@flame.co.za |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> Underscores in program names suck. To paraphrase Ali, "no opinion,
> just fact" ;)
>
> If we are going to rename programs wholesale, let's do it for release
> 7.0, and if we must have "pg" in front of everything, then do it as,
> e.g. "pgcreateuser". We could rename "pg_dump" as "pgdump" at the same
> time.
I agree regarding the underscore. I do think that changing the names
sooner would create less hassle in the long run. Especially now when
more and more folk are starting to use postgres.
> btw, is it only me or do other people refer to this as "pig dump"?
grunt :-)
--------
Regards
Theo
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Brook Milligan | 1999-09-20 16:19:49 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2 |
| Previous Message | Dmitry Samersoff | 1999-09-20 05:53:29 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jan Wieck | 1999-09-20 09:59:05 | Re: Referential Integrity In PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Vadim Mikheev | 1999-09-20 06:58:03 | Re: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach? |