Re: [HACKERS] regression bigtest needs very long time

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jan Wieck <jwieck(at)debis(dot)com>, robinson(at)netrinsics(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] regression bigtest needs very long time
Date: 1999-07-01 03:26:04
Message-ID: 377ADFCC.872F7116@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I do not believe for a moment that there are any portability bugs
> that will be uncovered by the 300-digit case but not by a 30-digit
> case.

Yeah, just gratuitous showmanship ;)

And think about those poor 486 machines. Maybe Jan is trying to burn
them out so they get replaced with something reasonable...

- Thomas

--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 1999-07-01 03:35:43 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.1 status
Previous Message Michael Robinson 1999-07-01 02:52:52 Re: [HACKERS] regression bigtest needs very long time