Re: [HACKERS] please?

From: Theo Kramer <theo(at)flame(dot)co(dot)za>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] please?
Date: 1999-05-31 20:01:30
Message-ID: 3752EA9A.C719EDFE@flame.co.za
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > > > Oracle OCI has oopt() and Informix Online has dirty read that do the trick for
> > > > > me.
> > > > > --------
> > > >
> > > > Please give me more information. How does dirty read fix the problem?
> > >
> > > It allows me to read uncommited records without blocking.
> >
> > I suppose it somehow lets you know whether the read was dirty or
> > clean...
>
> Not that I am aware of. Never heard that of Informix.

I also cheat. I use a 3 buffer approach, compare fields and see if a record
has
changed before I do an update.
--------
Regards
Theo

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1999-05-31 20:04:40 Re: [HACKERS] New IP address datatype
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-05-31 20:00:07 Re: [HACKERS] Backend sent 0x45 type while idle