Re: problems with table corruption continued

From: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
To: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Brian Hirt <bhirt(at)mobygames(dot)com>, Postgres Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Brian A Hirt <bhirt(at)berkhirt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: problems with table corruption continued
Date: 2001-12-18 19:49:24
Message-ID: 3705826352029646A3E91C53F7189E32518452@sectorbase2.sectorbase.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > Looks like we have to add checks for the case
> > TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId(tuple->t_cmin) when
> > there is HEAP_MOVED_OFF or HEAP_MOVED_IN in t_infomask to
> > all HeapTupleSatisfies* in tqual.c as we do in
> > HeapTupleSatisfiesDirty - note comments about uniq btree-s there.
>
> Sounds like a plan. Do you want to work on this, or shall I?

Sorry, I'm not able to do this fast enough for current pre-release stage -:(

Vadim

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-12-18 19:52:11 Re: Concerns about this release
Previous Message Doug McNaught 2001-12-18 19:47:37 Re: Concerns about this release