Re: [HACKERS] Some 6.5 regression tests are failing

From: Clark Evans <clark(dot)evans(at)manhattanproject(dot)com>
To: Michael Davis <michael(dot)davis(at)prevuenet(dot)com>
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Some 6.5 regression tests are failing
Date: 1999-03-30 05:04:32
Message-ID: 37005B60.A99BDC@manhattanproject.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> int2 .. failed
> int4 .. failed

Both int2 and int4 have been consistently failing
for me, but it is due to a wording problem:

pg_atoi: error reading "100000": Math result not representable
instead of
pg_atoi: error reading "100000": Numerical result out of range

Also, float8 usually fails for me, due to the expected
being a 'result is out of range' error, and the result being:

> ! bad|?column?
> ! ---+--------
> ! |0
> ! |NaN
etc.

> geometry .. failed

This almost always fails due to a rounding differences.
Is there a way to build the rounding into the test
so that it would fail if something is _really_ wrong?

> triggers .. failed

For me, "check_primary_key: even number of arguments should be specified"
is shown as an error, which is not 'expected', then, as a result,
everything else in the test fails.

This is definately a problem.

> misc .. failed
> plpgsql .. failed

I'm not too sure about these.. I had a host of other failures, but
this was due to me running the test in the wrong account....
running it in the right account now. :)

> I am running Red Hat 5.1 on intel. Should I be concerned about these? I am
> eager to get up and running on 6.5 but always seem to run into one obstacle
> or another.

I have the same configuration, Pentium Pro, RH 5.1 almost stock configuration.

Clark

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1999-03-30 05:20:11 Re: [HACKERS] Some 6.5 regression tests are failing
Previous Message Michael Davis 1999-03-30 05:04:23 Create user is failing under 6.5