Re: actualized SQL/PSM patch

From: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: actualized SQL/PSM patch
Date: 2008-04-03 02:06:46
Message-ID: 36e682920804021906x2af73d5cyeda277d7a16b4fdf@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> The fundamental problem I've got with this patch is that it adds 400K
> of new code (and that's just the code, not counting documentation or
> regression tests) that we'll have to maintain, to obtain a feature that
> so far as I've heard there is precisely zero demand for.

We have a customer that wants to use it as part of a MySQL-to-Postgres
migration.

--
Jonah H. Harris, Sr. Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
499 Thornall Street, 2nd Floor | jonah(dot)harris(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Edison, NJ 08837 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2008-04-03 02:13:47 Re: psql command aliases support
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-04-03 01:56:56 Re: [8.4] Updated WITH clause patch (non-recursive)