| From: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Susanne Ebrecht" <susanne(dot)ebrecht(at)credativ(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: 8.2 features? |
| Date: | 2006-07-14 01:50:06 |
| Message-ID: | 36e682920607131850m5503ccd5v6b9af0151de49c9a@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On 7/13/06, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> I agree that it's probably not going to happen for 8.2 but I certainly
> have uses for the SQL spec's definition of MERGE (table-level instead of
> the individual-tuple case). I'd like to see the individual-tuple
> UPSERT/REPLACE issue handled as well but I don't believe MERGE lacking
> that necessairly means MERGE should be ignored..
Where does Jan stand on it, I know he was doing some thinking about
how to accomplish it.
--
Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1300
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
33 Wood Ave S, 2nd Floor | jharris(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Iselin, New Jersey 08830 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-07-14 07:49:27 | Re: [DOCS] maintenance diff |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2006-07-14 01:30:26 | Re: 8.2 features? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2006-07-14 01:52:46 | Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2006-07-14 01:34:21 | Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kris Jurka | 2006-07-14 02:06:23 | include compile problems |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2006-07-14 01:30:26 | Re: 8.2 features? |