Re: I'm surprised to see the word master here

From: Renee <renee(dot)phillips(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: I'm surprised to see the word master here
Date: 2019-09-24 22:18:47
Message-ID: 36E41634-B602-4D7C-8ACE-7EA03D2DF6E5@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

I was under the impression that both terms were being deprecated. Is that only the case when they appear in tandem?

> On Sep 24, 2019, at 6:05 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> On 2019-09-24 21:58, PG Doc comments form wrote:
>> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>>
>> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/logical-replication-publication.html
>> Description:
>>
>> I was under the impression we were removing the use of that word from our
>> docs ?
>
> $ git grep -w master | wc -l
> 611
>
> You might be thinking of "slave".
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2019-09-24 22:28:04 Re: I'm surprised to see the word master here
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-09-24 22:13:13 Re: Do not use C++ style comments (// comments). Strict ANSI C compilers do not accept them.