| From: | "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | jwieck(at)debis(dot)com |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, vadim(at)krs(dot)ru, eberger(at)gewi(dot)kfunigraz(dot)ac(dot)at, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules |
| Date: | 1999-02-23 03:51:54 |
| Message-ID: | 36D225DA.527BA8FF@alumni.caltech.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> That is bad. He wants the Var nodes to have the same address. Why
> can't he use equal() like everyone else? Do you want to review his
> patch, and reverse anything that looks wrong in it. This may be the
> only way to make sure things are OK. The patch isn't that long.
But we should be clear: imho INTERSECT/EXCEPT can be dumped from v6.5 if
you find it is too ugly to make work, or if you find it trashed too much
other stuff. We can re-enable it later after working out the kinks...
- Tom
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-02-23 03:55:51 | Re: [GENERAL] Postgres Future: Postgres on Digital Alpha |
| Previous Message | Thomas G. Lockhart | 1999-02-23 03:13:07 | Re: [HACKERS] SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT) |