Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] big bad join problems

From: Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dustin Sallings <dustin(at)spy(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] big bad join problems
Date: 1999-02-02 02:58:03
Message-ID: 36B669BB.4EC6700F@krs.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 1 Feb 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > Actually, it's still fairly slow. I've got two things that my
> > view is pulling back now, and it's taking quite a while. I'm going to
> > load up a bunch of data and see if it gets any slower. Is there an actual
> > problem happening here?
>
> With the GEQO problems people were having, I have modified the default
> GEQO start table count from 8 to 6.
>
> People are having trouble at values of > 6 for a while, but
> someone(Vadim?) objected to setting it to six in the past. With two
> people having problems today, I wanted to lower it.

Yes, it was me. I don't object against 6, but just remember that
there were other people having troubles with GEQO and this is
why table count was increased from 6 to 8.

Vadim

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-02-02 02:58:32 Re: [HACKERS] Small patches in copy.c and trigger.c
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-02-02 02:55:41 Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer speed and GEQO (was: nested loops in joins)